one in which the costs of enforcement do not exceed what is acceptable, are
not worse than the crime, the cost/benefit argument.
Most Libertarians would say the laws against smoking marijuana are bad on
both counts. Only a fraction of smokers can be apprehended, which makes
enforcement arbitrary and capricious. And the cost of enforcement, home invasions
by SWAT teams, illegal searches, etc., plus maintaining prisons and breaking
up families and foregoing the productive output of the convicted person, etc.
etc. exceeds any social benefit from having a smoker use tobacco instead of
weed.
Something like half, possibly two thirds, of fertilized eggs (people, to the
pro-lifers) spontaneously abort or fail to implant or die early in the
gestation. In most cases, the mother doesn't even know. However, if abortion is
homicide, then every lifeless zygote should be treated as a dead human.
First, it must be found. All tampons and sanitary napkins must be turned in to
the county medical examine to determine if a fertilized egg is present and, if
so, to issue a death certificate. Then the grand jury (a bunch of ignorant
and bigoted clods who don't have the wit to be excused from jury duty) must
determine whether the death was "natural" or "murder". (How are they supposed
to determine that?) Then, of course, there must be a proper burial or
cremation of the corpse, including, in most states, a coffin and a designated
cemetery. It the death of the zygote was not "natural", perhaps a third of the
cases, both the mother and the doctor are guilty of pre-meditated murder, and
subject, in most states, to the death penalty. Jailing or executing two
adults is very expensive, and their children become wards of the state, and their
student loans are defaulted on, and they don't pay taxes, and... It there
is anything less than 100 per cent prosecution and severe penalties for
feticide, then we are making a mockery of the law and depriving other murderers,
like drive-by shooters, of the equal protection (or neglect) of the law. What
is it about "murder" you don't understand, Ms. Juror?
Additional questions: Suppose a teen age girl has a late period and doesn't
tell anyone, flushing her tampon down the toilet? Can she be prosecuted for
abuse of a corpse? Tampering with evidence? Does she have an excuse of
"accidental death" because she miscounted her birth control pills, took too few
and then too many, resulting in a accidental conception and an accidental
abortion? What if she claims it was God's way of giving her a second chance,
because she was genuinely contrite about letting Johnny do that thing?
Then there is the Terry Schiavo problem. If two doctors determine that an
adult has no functioning brain, the adult can be declared "brain dead" and
deprived of further life support. What if a pregnant woman goes to two doctors
who pronounce her blastocyst "brainless" (no neural tube formed yet), can
life support be withdrawn? If not, why the double standard?
Extending the logic of an embryo of a human is a human, then an embryo of a
pine tree is a pine tree. If I burn a pine cone, I have burned a whole
forest! that should be good for several years in jail.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
