He did NOT say that those rights come from govt; it IS a matter of
legal recognition. 

-TLP


--- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I disagree. Rights are NOT given to us by the state or by political
> aperatus Mark. Rights, are those things that are believed to be
ours
> with out strings attached. Human seems far more apropriate to me
for
> discussing rights Mark. Thats why they say "Human rights" Mark.
>
> --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote:
> >
> > For our purposes, "human" seems more scientific and "person" more
> > political. I believe the latter is more accommodating for
> > discussing rights.
> >
> > 
> >
> > ************
> > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> > unjust lawsuits.
> > See www.fija.org 
> > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > A person is a human, and a human is a person.  They are identical
> > and
> > interchangeable terms.  What do you think Human means ... robot?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> > <txliberty@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I object to employing the word 'human' to mean 'person' as the
> > issue
> > > is already rife with people talking past each other  :( 
> > >
> > > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > > Please see what I wrote in this forum as
> > > 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
> > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100 
> > >
> > >
> >
>







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to