yup...guess that little nukuler...nuclear...arsonal....world 2nd largest...is just a little pop-goes-the-weasel...huh
On 6/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, Russia does not represent a credible threat to the US. They are not > saying that they are going to attack nor are they able to attack us and > cause any meaningful harm. It is an obvious truth that simply having means > does not constitute a threat, and no sane person make such an idiotic claim. > > BWS > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: kiddleddee <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <kiddleddee%40yahoo.com>> > > __________________________________________________________ > > > > Boyd, Russia represents a credible threat to the United State. Is > > it > > stupid to sit idly by and not nuke them to remove such a credible > > threat. So does China and France and England and several other > > countries that have enough nuclear weapons and/or ground troops - > > and the means to deliver them - to destroy the United State. Do we > > nuke all of them? > > -- ***************************************** "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately!" ...Ben Franklin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
