Your not the first to say the same Mark, you wont be the last. You 
are not a costomer and I am not a salesman. You want to read what I 
say read it, if not don't. I wont be hurt either way.


--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Uncool, you wrote:
> "The unfortunate reality of reality is that it is clear cut nor
> is it black and white."
> For this reason, I virtually never read past your first line;
> because it is immediately apparent that you NEVER proofread your
> posts or care to communicate effectively. 
> -Mark
> 
>  
> 
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org  
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
> 
> 
> ---------------
> 
> The unfortunate reality of reality is that it is clear cut nor is
> it 
> black and white.
> 
> As per former secretary of treasury Paul O'Niel the decision to
> go 
> to war was made while George Bush was President Elect, before he 
> took office. The basis, from Mr. O'Niel's observation was the
> idea 
> developed by Rice, Cheney, Rumsfield and Bush that "rouge
> nations" 
> were the greatest threat to US supremecy over the world. The
> aleged 
> idea was that overwhleming force used against a "rouge nation"
> would 
> serve to discourage the 'rouge nations' 'rouge' behavior.
> 
> The decision to target Iraq over other options was made with out 
> O'Niel's involvment so he could not comment on that rational, but
> 
> the decision was made. Reasons to justify it were then sought out
> by 
> the adminstration, CIA cheif Tenent was the main party
> responsible 
> for finding cause to wage the war that Bush and his closest
> advisors 
> had already set there mind on having.
> 
> 
> One of the largest problems I have with this assesment is 
> Afghanistan, if the goal had been to set an example then
> Afghanistan 
> should have been sufficient. The agenda was not to set an
> example, 
> the agenda was to invade Iraq. The most absurd reality, is that
> the 
> result was the exact oposite of the aleged desired effect. With
> the 
> armed forces bogged down in Iraq, and the US Army proportedly
> broken 
> those 'rouge nations' have become more emboldened. Iran stepped
> up 
> its enrichment program and is unshakably defiant, North Korea had
> 
> its flare up of defiance, China has become more assertive in its 
> claim of dominion over Taiwan. Mr. O'Niel often pondered the fact
> 
> that the discussion was always how will we go to war with Iraq
> and 
> never why.  
> 
> Regaurdless of wether the agenda was deterance or not, what is
> clear 
> is that it was not clear and presetn danger, nor eminant threat
> that 
> promted the war in Iraq. I could go on and on about my own
> Senetor, 
> Carl Levon the senior member of the Armed Forces Comitte in the 
> Senate how ever I thought the thoughts of a former high level
> Bush 
> aid and long time Republican would be of more value. 
> 
> --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote:
> >
> > Rep. Paul has made a logical and thoughtful argument against
> what 
> he believes to be an initiation of aggression in Iraq.  His
> stance 
> is principled.  The only question to me is whether or not the 
> conflict in Iraq is a case of legitimate reaction to a credible 
> threat of aggression or not.  No one has been able to make a
> clear 
> cut case in either direction.
> > 
> > BWS
> >
>










------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XmUd6C/bOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to