oh well....looks like thick would be a better phrase then.
what was your question specifically?
On 6/20/06, mark robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Don't portray me as "stubborn" for questioning your words! YOU
> wrote them, not me. You WILL be called on your unsupported
> inconsistencies here; that's what we do here; that's what this
> discussion forum is all about.
>
> In this regard, NO, your position is still not clear.
>
>
> -Mark
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> -----------------
>
> Abandon my previous environmental focus?
>
> You misunderstand. I will try to be more clear for you and anyone
> else
> stubbornly holding onto the 'environmental focus' segment of my
> post...
>
> It does not matter to me what the law is....it is THE LAW. If you
> do not
> agree with the law, change or abolish it. My pose concerned the
> Supreme
> Court as a function of the Bush White House and the dangers we
> are facing.
> My point was that you can abolish all the laws you choose and it
> will not
> matter a tad when Martial Law is imposes...as I am sure it will
> be...in the
> next 2 to 3 years.
>
> The origional post did nto focus on environmental law but on
> abuse of power
> by the Supreme Court.
> Clear now?
>
> On 6/20/06, mark robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <colowe%40iquest.net>> wrote:
> >
> > John,
> >
> > What do I think? As I said, I agree with the LP's position on
> > environmental laws on that page. And since you didn't repeat
> your
> > support of environmental laws, I agree with every word you just
> > said. If you wish to abandon your earlier environmental focus,
> > that's not only fine it's great. Yes, our rights are certainly
> in
> > danger.
> >
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > ************
>
>
>
--
*****************************************
"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang
separately!" ...Ben Franklin
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/zHUd1C/gOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
