mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Vic,
> 
> First, what you call "all or nothing', we call "consistency" and
> "reciprocal / universal application". Second, you claim to speak
> for the disagreement of others but you actually speak of your
> own. Third, since you disagree with Libertarianism's main
> principles*, why do you care about its popularity? 
> (*You support seat-belt laws AND drug prohibition.)

as a parent I do support drug decriminalisation but not legalisation.

really the LP has to ask itself, is it there to push some idealogy
or is there to get a benefit for america?  the purist claim its there to
push idealogy, I beleive it should be there to get a benefit for americans.

Vic





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to