Here's another question for ya. If I'm not an advocate of some libertarianism, than why is it that I spend so much of my time working for libertarian causes? Why is it that I assisted the LP of Texas in 2004 collecting nearly 4,000 signatures for ballot access? Why is it that I put up 3 (!!!) out of state LP Petitioners at my home, and shuffled them around for months in my car, at my own expense during the ballot drive?
Hey, if I was a "conservative" wouldn't I want to help out the Constitution Party? --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I assume it is not ad hominem to elaborate on one's degree of > libertarianism who has just confessed it. > > Inconsistent libertarian = unequal rights advocate = believes > that some (people's) rights are more important than others = > anti-libertarian. > > In authoritarian mainstream = authoritarian = opposite of > libertarian. > > Now I can further reinforce my dondero disclaimer. > > -Mark > > > > > > ************ > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions. > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and > unjust lawsuits. > See www.fija.org > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > -------------------------- > > > You are correct, for I am an advocate of small 'l' limited > libertarianism, NOT a Big 'L' Libertarian connected with the > Libertarian Party. > > My views represent an inconsistent 'Mainstream' libertarianism, > not Big 'L' Libertarians who are mostly out of the authoritarian > Mainstream. > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> > wrote: > > > > Readers: If you are wondering what large parts of Eric > Dondero's > > posts have to do with Libertarian principles, the answer is > > probably "nothing". Please consider the source. Many of his > posts > > are not only unrelated to libertarian principles, they are > > anathema, despite his frequent representation to the contrary. > In > > fact, his submissions have a reputation for getting rejected by > > the moderator 10-25% of the time. Libertarian philosophy and > its > > representatives are not always synchronous, largely due to the > > tolerant nature of the former. > > > > -Mark > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/3EuRwD/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
