Eric,
Your activism that contradicts your inconsistent philosophy is
not an issue, and I would be a fool to try to explain it for you.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
---------------------
Here's another question for ya. If I'm not an advocate of some
libertarianism, than why is it that I spend so much of my time
working for libertarian causes? Why is it that I assisted the LP
of Texas in 2004 collecting nearly 4,000 signatures for ballot
access? Why is it that I put up 3 (!!!) out of state LP
Petitioners at my home, and shuffled them around for months in my
car, at my own expense during the ballot drive?
Hey, if I was a "conservative" wouldn't I want to help out the
Constitution Party?
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I assume it is not ad hominem to elaborate on one's degree of
> libertarianism who has just confessed it.
>
> Inconsistent libertarian = unequal rights advocate = believes
> that some (people's) rights are more important than others =
> anti-libertarian.
>
> In authoritarian mainstream = authoritarian = opposite of
> libertarian.
>
> Now I can further reinforce my dondero disclaimer.
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's
instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at
a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and
fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> --------------------------
>
>
> You are correct, for I am an advocate of small 'l' limited
> libertarianism, NOT a Big 'L' Libertarian connected with the
> Libertarian Party.
>
> My views represent an inconsistent 'Mainstream' libertarianism,
> not Big 'L' Libertarians who are mostly out of the
authoritarian
> Mainstream.
>
> --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Readers: If you are wondering what large parts of Eric
> Dondero's
> > posts have to do with Libertarian principles, the answer is
> > probably "nothing". Please consider the source. Many of his
> posts
> > are not only unrelated to libertarian principles, they are
> > anathema, despite his frequent representation to the
contrary.
> In
> > fact, his submissions have a reputation for getting rejected
by
> > the moderator 10-25% of the time. Libertarian philosophy and
> its
> > representatives are not always synchronous, largely due to
the
> > tolerant nature of the former.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3EuRwD/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
