Incredible. Every single one of the individuals you mention below would fall well within the Libertarian Quadrant of the Political Quiz that you were handing out.
Take Jesse Ventura. Go ahead, answer the questions for him. I think you'll find he ends up at about 80/80. Tom McClintock? More like 90/100. How you going to explain that to those "40,000" people you handed those cards out to? --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Know how many Mark Selzer and I handed out at the 4-Day's of Unity > Rave? Over 10,000. Then I set us up with an information booth (for > free) at an even larger rave with 45,000 people where we handed out > close to 20,000 cards, stickers, balloons, and lollypops. At this one > event we registered more than 500 people to be libertarians and got 20 > or so to join the party. > > Your so-called activist resume will never compare, especially when you > include the anti-libertarian things you've done like setup a webpage > encouraging people to vote for the single least libertarian president > in American history, claiming incredibly non-libertarian people like > Joe Lieberman, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Dennis Miller, Tom McClintock, > Jesse Ventura, etc. were libertarians and thus proving your don't > comprehend the meaning of the word "libertarian", let alone work > toward libertarianism. > > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > <ericdondero@> wrote: > > > > Do you know how many Political Quizes I handed out to Lieberman > > campaign workers and volunteers? > > > > Oh, maybe 40 to 50. > > > > With just about all of them, I walked them through the Quiz, and > > explained the questions to them, and especially graded them and > > explained to them the Pro-Freedom position on the issues they got > > wrong. > > > > I can assure you every one of these political activists came away > > with a positive impression of libertarianism and the libertarian > > movement. > > > > But I guess, it's better if we libertarians simply play it safe. > > Continue to attend our Monthly LP Supper Club meetings at Chiles and > > talk about issues amongst our Libertarian friends for hours on end, > > huh? > > > > Best not to get our hands dirty in the business of real world > > politics. Nah, let's continue to Preach to the Chior. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Andr� Kenji de Kenji de" > > <andrekenjilistas2@> wrote: > > > > > > http://hammeroftruth.com/2006/08/08/libertarians-urged-to- board- > > joementum-train-wreck/ > > > RLC Founder Urges Libertarians to Board "Joementum" Train Wreck > > > > > > [image: Lieberman - libertarian rumors]According to the latest > > polls, > > > Joe "Kissy > > > Face<http://www.wonkette.com/politics/funny-pictures/bush- kissing- > > lieberman-video-032091.php>" > > > Lieberman is running over 10 points behind Ned > > > "Kos- > > Approved<http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/05/nedheads > > _pay_ho.html>" > > > Lamont in the Connecticut Democratic primary race for Senate. > > Barring a > > > miracle, Joe Lieberman will *not* be the Democratic nominee. > > However, the > > > taller half of "Sore/Loserman > > > > > 2000<http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/12/04/stickers. > > election/>" > > > has indicated that he will run as an independent for the seat > > after a > > > trouncing by his own party. > > > > > > Now, why should Lieberman's sour grapes independent run, which may > > have cost > > > him the primary in the first > > > > > place<http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/08/08/thoughts_on_connec > > ticut.html>, > > > matter to libertarians? According to Eric "Master > > > Shake<http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2004/tle275-20040613-04.html>" > > > Dondero Rittberg, > > > > > liberventionist<http://www.antiwar.com/stromberg/s041302.html>gadfly > > > and founder of the Republican > > > Liberty Caucus <http://www.rlc.org/> (their motto: "he promised to > > stop > > > beating us if we stay and work it out"), Lieberman is "one of the > > ONLY > > > decent Democrats in the Nation" and deserves libertarian support. > > Not only > > > that, he's pimping Libertarians for Lieberman on various email > > > lists<http://www.libertarianpeacenik.com/articles/lieberman.htm>and > > > encouraging people to call him on his cell phone to help. > > > > > > Leaving aside for a second that Lieberman is > > > pro- > > war<http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/pro_war_lieberman_bombing > > _with_dems_regionalnews_maggie_haberman__in_west_hartford__conn___and > > _tom_topousis__in_new_york.htm>, > > > pro- > > censorship<http://stupidevilbastard.com/index/seb/comments/sen_joseph > > _lieberman_gets_worked_up_over_video_games_again/>, > > > and pro-government > > > > > intervention<http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/20 > > 06/07/28/michael_schiavo_campaigns_against_lieberman/>(especially > > > since the > > > last Presidential candidate Rittberg > > > > > endorsed<http://web.archive.org/web/20040925062425/http://www.liberta > > riansforbush.com/>was > > > all of those things), haven't we libertarians learned a painful > > > lesson about endorsing defectors from the major > > > parties<http://hammeroftruth.com/2006/06/06/an-inconvenient- > > libertarian-video-clip-william-weld-doesnt-want-you-to-watch/>? > > > Not only is Lieberman not a libertarian, I'm predicting that after > > the polls > > > close in Connecticut tonight, he's also going to be a loser. > > > > > > While some rightly criticize our willingness to lose while > > clinging to our > > > principles <http://www.freeliberal.com/archives/000450.html>, > > Rittberg would > > > have us abandon our principles to lose with a loser who's > > abandoned his. > > > > > > Update by Stephen VanDyke: RLC Secretary Thomas Sewell commented: > > > > > > I can tell you categorically that Rittberg is not an officer, > > spokesman or > > > otherwise entitled to speak on behalf of the RLC. Please attribute > > his views > > > solely to him, not to the RLC. > > > > > > Ouch > > > > > > Update by Nicholas Sarwark: As predicted, Lieberman > > > > > lost<http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/08/lieberman_concedes > > _connecticut.html>and > > > he's gonna pick up his sour grapes and try to run as an > > Independent. > > > It's a gutsy move, but all of the bigtime Dems he got to stump for > > him in > > > the primary are very unlikely to support him now that Ned Lamont > > has been > > > selected as the Democratic nominee. > > > > > > Update by Nicholas Sarwark: Looks like Rittberg is in good > > > > > company<http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/08/09/rove_offers_help > > _to_lieberman.html>in > > > backing Lieberman's bid. > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
