It's not, because you would make illegal an activity that might only be limited
by some contracts. Even in the case where the contract specifies that neither
party is to commit adultery, it is not a criminal matter if one party intended
to uphold the terms of the contract but later violated them for whatever
reason. Then it's a matter of tort in which the other party must prove injury.
Women are not property and cannot be treated like slaves. You would alienate
people from their right to freely associate by completely criminalizing an
activity that is only a contract violation in some cases.
David Macko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My position is the pure libertarian viewpoint, as you should see if
you
took time to read my response.
David Macko
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:00 PM
Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy
of Open I
He was answering my question about using the government to make laws
enforcing religious morality (specifically laws pertaining to fidelity
) because he stated that he'd support the freedom of
"unmarried/unengaged" women to have any sex they wanted if they were
over the age of 18 which is a disturbing and extremely non-libertarian
viewpoint.
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
