We could attract a lot more members to the Libertarian Party by stressing the importance of freedom of association more than we do. We have fallen down in that area.
David Macko ----- Original Message ----- From: Cory Nott To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:49 PM Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I Private people have the inherent right to choose their associations which includes avoiding association with people they deem to be acting immorally or are otherwise undesirable. I disagree with the stance of David's organization (and I'm in an interracial marriage myself), but it's not hard to see that what they want is to not be forced by the state to associate with people like me whether in their homes, their schools (private I hope), places of business, or other private property. The state should not prohibit association nor should it force them. ma ni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David, But you have yet to explain how you can claim to not advocate the prohibition, and agree with #6 (which contradicts your claim). -Mark +++++++++++++++++ For the fourth or fifth time, I do not advocate prohibition of interracial marriages. I do believe that it is a bad idea. For life, liberty, justice and peace, David Macko [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
