----- Original Message -----
From: David Macko
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
Fallacy of Open I
The mere fact that government schools (as well as the establishment
media) are promoting miscegenation should be a cautionary clue for you.
As previously stated, I recognize good outcomes of miscegenation,
including but not limited to George Washington Carver, Booker T. Washington,
and Halle Berry (sp?) I wish that the people on the other side of the debate
would be as willing to concede the less optimal outcomes, including but not
limited
to India, Egypt, Haiti, Brazil and most of the rest of Latin America.
As for the debate over intellectual, moral and other behavioral differences
among the races, I recognize that you are not going to accept my scientific
citations of scholars such as Dr. Philippe Rushton, Madison Grant and
Lothrop Stoddard and I have read enough not to accept yours.
However, as adherents of libertarian principles, I hope that we can
work together to oppose suppression of intellectual debate so that
when one side is finally castrated it will only be ideologically.
For life, liberty and truth,
David Macko
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:26 AM
Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
Fallacy of Open I
Leave it up to Dave Macko to find one thing government schools are
doing right. There's certainly nothing wrong with miscegenation. In
fact I promote it myself. Personally speaking I can't wait until all
races are mixed together so much there's no telling people apart.
By then, the ignorant racists and fools who suggests there are
differences in abilities, character, honesty, etc. based on race, will be
idealogically neutered.
--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Government schools are promoting miscegenation.
> Both the states and fedgov actively prevent freedom
> of association.
> I have attended several CofCC conventions since I
> joined the organization. There is no effort to outlaw
> miscegenation. If there were such an effort, I would
> take the libertarian position in this matter as I do in
> all others.
>
> For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> David Macko
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: James Landrith
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:27 PM
> Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re:
[Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I
>
>
> Of course private people have a right to their own free
association rights.
> I don't think I saw anyone here arguing otherwise. However, the
manifesto
> point I referred to earlier clearly calls for the state
(government) to stop
> tolerating (outlaw) interracial marriage, licentiousness,
homosexuality and
> other things that bother the CofCC.
>
> There is a difference between what Macko is saying and what is
actually said
> on the CofCC's own manifesto. I know, Gordon Baum says they don't
want to
> outlaw interracial marriages. Their own website says otherwise.
This is
> plain as day.
>
> Further, an organization that just wanted to be left alone would
not need
> the state to not "tolerate" the free association rights and sexual
practices
> of others in such detail. They would simply need their own private
property
> rights protected, rather than calling on the state to no longer
tolerate the
> individual rights of those with which they disagree.
>
> Macko is refusing to see the difference. And there is a big
difference.
>
> __________________________________________________________
> James Landrith
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547
> AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159
> MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith
> Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com
> The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com
> The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/
> __________________________________________________________
>
> _____
>
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Cory Nott
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re:
[Libertarian] Re: The
> Fallacy of Open I
>
> Private people have the inherent right to choose their
associations which
> includes avoiding association with people they deem to be acting
immorally
> or are otherwise undesirable. I disagree with the stance of David's
> organization (and I'm in an interracial marriage myself), but it's
not hard
> to see that what they want is to not be forced by the state to
associate
> with people like me whether in their homes, their schools (private
I hope),
> places of business, or other private property.
>
> The state should not prohibit association nor should it force them.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
