--- In Libertarian message 53376 at >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/53376 , > Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How the US treats it's troops that disagree with killing innocent people in an illegal war started by a president who was illegally appointed. Thanks for posting that article. Oh -- and BTW, NObody "appointed" W. The U.S. Supreme Court, acting on an appeal of a bizarre ruling by the FL Supremes (second only to the 9th Circus in outrageous judicial activism IMO), sent the case BACK to those FL Supremes (who had ruled at first that it was okay for different counties and jurisdictions to adopt their own rules for recounts, different from one another). Rightly or wrongly, the SCOTUS said that ruling violated the equal protection clause, and remanded the case back WITHOUT a final edict -- indicating ONLY that a SINGLE METHOD of recounts had to be chosen -- but the SCOTUS did NOT choose it. You may disagree with what the SCOTUS did, but declaring they did something they did NOT do is beyond ridiculous.
