Was he born yet?--- In [email protected], "DC Collins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I dunno - I am leaning toward Thoreau.
>
> DC :)
>
>
>
> "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech
censored,
> the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all
> irrevocably."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of David Macko
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
> libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part
>
>
>
> Who would you have supported for president if you were alive in
1788?
> I do not mean to imply that George Washington was perfect, merely
that
> he was the greatest American who ever lived.
>
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
>
> NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
> Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
> They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You
have
> no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the
> current President.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: terry12622000
> To: Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:29 PM
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
libertarian
> movement and the Libertarian Part
>
> I don't think he was the best person for the job. I think his
> commerical interest had a lot to do with him back the Constitution
to
> replace the Articles Of Confederation--- In
> Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com,
> "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote:
> >
> > After all, suppose that it was 1788. Would you want to run
against
> George Washington?
> >
> > For life and liberty,
> > David Macko
> >
> > NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National
Security
> Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or
notice.
> They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You
> have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of
> the current President.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Julius No
> > To: Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:22 PM
> > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
> libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part
> >
> >
> > --- In Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com, "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The Libertarian Party could change its rule about endorsing
> > candidates of other parties. Another alternative would
> > > be to nominate an LP candidate who pledges to withdraw if Ron
> Paul
> > becomes the Republican nominee. This would also
> > > be determined by the delegates at the LP national convention.
> > >
> > > For life and liberty,
> > > David Macko
> >
> > I like that last part.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
