We are in total agreement about Hamilton. Adams did make a big mistake with the Alien and Sedition Acts. How about Jefferson?
For life and liberty, David Macko NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President. ----- Original Message ----- From: terry12622000 To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 4:52 PM Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part I would have perferd the senators picked the president for a 1 year term under the articles of confederation. Under the Constitution i'm not sure who I would be for but it would not have been Wasington, Adams or Hamltion.--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Who would you have supported for president if you were alive in 1788? > I do not mean to imply that George Washington was perfect, merely that he was the greatest American who ever lived. > > For life and liberty, > David Macko > > NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: terry12622000 > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:29 PM > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part > > > I don't think he was the best person for the job. I think his > commerical interest had a lot to do with him back the Constitution to > replace the Articles Of Confederation--- In > [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote: > > > > After all, suppose that it was 1788. Would you want to run against > George Washington? > > > > For life and liberty, > > David Macko > > > > NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security > Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. > They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You > have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of > the current President. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Julius No > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:22 PM > > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the > libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote: > > > > > > The Libertarian Party could change its rule about endorsing > > candidates of other parties. Another alternative would > > > be to nominate an LP candidate who pledges to withdraw if Ron > Paul > > becomes the Republican nominee. This would also > > > be determined by the delegates at the LP national convention. > > > > > > For life and liberty, > > > David Macko > > > > I like that last part. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
