I'm not thrilled with the way he acted on some very big
constitutional issues and i'm not sure he would have been better than
Washington, plus I don't like the fact that both of them were
slaveowners. I doubt if I would have wanted any slave
owner.
I don't know much about him but what about Smauel ADams? Or
what about Ethan Allen? or Paul Revere? Were they still alive and
doing well, did either hold political office after the revolution and
how well did they
do?
I probably would have favored a native son, since TN. was not a
state yet, probably someone from the hills of NC, SC, VA. or GA. a
non slave owning farmer and distiller someone who have fought hard
against the liquor tax and other excise taxes.--- In
[email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We are in total agreement about Hamilton. Adams did make a big
mistake with the Alien and Sedition Acts.
> How about Jefferson?
>
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
>
> NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You
have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of
the current President.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: terry12622000
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 4:52 PM
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part
>
>
> I would have perferd the senators picked the president for a 1
year
> term under the articles of confederation. Under the Constitution
i'm
> not sure who I would be for but it would not have been Wasington,
> Adams or Hamltion.--- In [email protected], "David
Macko"
> <dmacko@> wrote:
> >
> > Who would you have supported for president if you were alive in
> 1788?
> > I do not mean to imply that George Washington was perfect,
merely
> that he was the greatest American who ever lived.
> >
> > For life and liberty,
> > David Macko
> >
> > NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National
Security
> Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or
notice.
> They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight.
You
> have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment
of
> the current President.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: terry12622000
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:29 PM
> > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
> libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part
> >
> >
> > I don't think he was the best person for the job. I think his
> > commerical interest had a lot to do with him back the
> Constitution to
> > replace the Articles Of Confederation--- In
> > [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote:
> > >
> > > After all, suppose that it was 1788. Would you want to run
> against
> > George Washington?
> > >
> > > For life and liberty,
> > > David Macko
> > >
> > > NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National
> Security
> > Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or
> notice.
> > They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight.
> You
> > have no recourse nor protection save to call for the
impeachment
> of
> > the current President.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Julius No
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:22 PM
> > > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
> > libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Libertarian Party could change its rule about endorsing
> > > candidates of other parties. Another alternative would
> > > > be to nominate an LP candidate who pledges to withdraw if
Ron
> > Paul
> > > becomes the Republican nominee. This would also
> > > > be determined by the delegates at the LP national
convention.
> > > >
> > > > For life and liberty,
> > > > David Macko
> > >
> > > I like that last part.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
