subliminal political suicide and even Treason?? Part 18 Simple Inquiry
Of Fact....Part 18


Exodus to Self-Government PART 18, Our Sovereign Roots

http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/blog/our-soveriegn-roots/
<http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/blog/our-soveriegn-roots/>




An Historical Record Knowledge UPDATE and No Cost Downloads for further
private research and inquiry.

We can learn from history how past generations thought and acted, how
they responded to the demands of their time and how they solved their
problems. We can learn by analogy, not by example, for our circumstances
will always be different than theirs were. The main thing history can
teach us is that human actions have consequences and that certain
choices, once made, cannot be undone. They foreclose the possibility of
making other choices and thus they determine future events. Our
ignorance of history causes us to slander our own times. Flaubert



DaySpring Gatherings Network
Gabriel Paul
February 23, 2008
DaySpring Gatherings Network Blog by Gabriel Paul RSS Feed here:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/DayspringGatheringsNetworkBlogByGabrielPaul
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/DayspringGatheringsNetworkBlogByGabrielPaul\
>

http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=1709239&loc=en_U\
S
<http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=1709239&loc=en_\
US>

Truth the Greatest Disinfectant like Light against Disinformation, Lies
and Spin





                         GOVERNMENT IS MENTAL AND FUNCTIONAL ACTION



The only mind exercised was that of the commonwealth. Such acts are
natural, being just what society formed for, and being just as little
calculated to destroy, or, in any wise impair, the "moral
person," i.e. the body-politic, as the functional action of the
brain, heart, lungs, or stomach is to do so to the natural living being.
A republican commonwealth's acts of self-government, whether in
making constitutions of government, or acting under them, are entirely
functional, and not self-destructive or revoluntionary, and the mistake
of supposing the states were resolved into a new state, by the voluntary
and separate action of the thirteen, is alike pitiable and pernicious.
If the "public conviction" that was done, was as Mr. George T.
Curtis claims, brough about by Daniel Webster, that great man is to be
credited with having produced our "abomination of
desolation,"—the war against statehood, resulting in the
destruction of our glorious commonwealths!



The same mental organism now exists in working order, with complete
individuality, and separate mind and will. The states are not
nationalized or consolidated into one. Nor are they in any respect
changed in either form or substance. They still are the "union of
states,"[1]
<../../../../citizensoftheUSofA/post?referer=/group/citizensoftheUSofA/m\
essages%3fo%3d1%26yguid%3d208120019&use_rte=1#_ftn1>  or  "united  
states:" but it remains to be seen whether their wills are
enslaved—deprived of volition!—whether the union, once
voluntary—is not overthrown and constrained! Whether the once
"free, sovereign and independent states" are
shackled!—pinned together once again by the most powerful standing
army, and bayonets!—whether, in fine, the once proud and free
commonwealths of America are remanded to their provincialism! and
brought under the most heartless and unconscionable of all
depotisms—a corporate monarchy!



"CONTINUED" NEW YORK TESTIFIES IDEM SONANS—In 1776, she, as
a provincial body-politic, joined twelve others, in declaring their
independence. Each was represented by her own deputies, and they were
thus able to co-act in congress. Whatever was done, was by a concurrence
of individual wills.

In 1777, her first constitution was established, containing the
following absolute declarations of sovereign right—principles
essential to liberty, and the same yesterday, to-day and FOREVER!

Considering herself to be the supplanter of British sovereignty, she
declared as follows: "All powers whatever therein [i.e. in the state
of New York] hath reverted to the people thereof; and this convention
hath, by their suffrages and free choice, been appointed and authorized
to institute and establish a government,…calculated to secure the
rights and liberties of the good people of this state…..




"1st. This convention, therefore, in the name, and by the authority
of the good people of this state, doth ordain, determine, and declare:
that "no authority shall, on any pretense, whatever, be exercised
over the people or members of this state, but shall as shall be derived
from or granted by them."

She began the century recently closed, with this declaration; and though
her fundamental law has been several times reconstructed, the
declaration stands now! and it will forever stand! For no authority but
hers is ever to exercised on her soil!



She further declares, in her present organic law of government, that
"the sovereignty and jurisdiction of this state extend to all places
within the boundary thereof,…but the extent of such jurisdiction,
over places that have been or may be ceded to the united   states, shall
be qualified by the terms of such cession.." [Const. of  N.Y.][2]
<../../../../citizensoftheUSofA/post?referer=/group/citizensoftheUSofA/m\
essages%3fo%3d1%26yguid%3d208120019&use_rte=1#_ftn2>



She also declares it to be "the duty of the Governor, and all
subordinate officers, to maintain and defend her sovereignty and
jurisdiction." [N.Y. Rev. Stat., Ch. I., Tit. 2.]



"The people of this state, in their right of sovereignty, are deemed
to possess the original and ultimate property in, and to, all lands
within the jurisdiction of this state; and all lands, the title of which
shall fail from a defect of heirs, shall revert or escheat to the
people." [Const.  N.Y., Art. I., Sect. 2.]



Virginia expresses it as follows:

"All escheats, penalties, and forfeitures, heretofore going to the
king, shall go to the commonwealth" [Const.  Va.]; and Judge Kent
states the American doctrine to be, that, "the state steps in place
of the feudal lord, by virtue of its sovereignty, as the original and
ultimate proprietor of all the lands within its jurisdiction." [All
the italics and bold above are mine.]



                                                                            
FEDERAL SITES



The treatment of Uncle Sam by these high and mighty potentates, is quite
consistent with their imperial words. Massachusetts and New York united
states (no to the nation or government, but to the said states) sites
for arsenals, forts, navy-yards, light-houses, post-offices, etc.,
relying on their solemnly plighted faith, not only to guaranty and
secure the states, in being and acting as republics, or absolute
self-governing peoples, but to use the said sites solely for the defence
"and welfare" of said states. grant to the



The sites of forts Warren, Lafayette, Delaware, Monroe, Moultrie, and
others, are acquired and held by the united states, from the respective
states in which they are situated, on conditions such as the following,
in the act ceding the use and jurisdiction of the site of the Brooklyn
Navy-yard: "the united states are to retain such use and
jurisdiction, so long as said tract shall be applied to the defence and
safety of the city and port of New York, and no longer ["defence and
safety of the said state, and no longer," are the words in the
Watervleit arsenal cession]…. But the jurisdiction hereby ceded, and
the exemption of taxation herein granted, shall continue, in respect to
said property, and to each portion thereof, so long as the same shall
remain property of the united states, and be used for the purposes
aforesaid, and no longer" [see also statutes of Mass., June 17,
1800; June 20, 1816; April 23, 1847; April 21, 1848; May 4, 1853; Stat.
Pa., April 18, 1795;  Feb. 1. 1796; Stat. Va. March 1, 1821; and Stat.
S.C., Dec. 19, 1805.]  There are over 50 of these acts in the statutes
of Massachusetts, and over 150 in those of New York.





                                                 SUMMING UP THE TESTIMONY



Let us now analyze and reduce the averments of fact, the statement of
these august witnesses. They show conclusively:



1.                  That "all power is inherent in the people"
of the state; and that the phrases, the "sovereign and independent
body-politic," "the commonwealth," "the state," and
"the people," are all used in one and the same declaration as
synonymous. And, to preclude doubt, Massachusetts redeclares her
sovereignty with still greater emphasis, as follows: the people of this
commonwealth have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves
as a free, SOVEREIGN, and INDEPENDENT state."



2.                  That no power ever goes out of the state, except by
delegation; that all power belongs to the state as much as after
delegation as before; and that delegated powers must necessarily be
used, for the state, by her "substitutes and agents."



3.                  That all the powers in the general government are
delegated by, and derived from, the "sovereign and independent
bodies-politic,"—that is to say, "the commonwealths" or
"the states'—"the people" having no political existence,
or capacity for political action, except as such
"bodies-politic," or "states." Said DANIEL WEBSTER:
"No such thing as sovereignty of government," "is known in
North  America." "With us, all power is in the people."
[Speech of 1833.]



4.                  That the said "people,"
"body-politic," "commonwealth," or "state" have
an "inalienable and indefeasible right to institute, reform, alter,
or totally change government," whenever they think proper.



5.                  That no authority can be existed in the state but
that derived from the people thereof, i.e., from the "sovereign
body-politic," "the commonwealth, "the state."



                               The Constitution is Law in a state by her
Will



It follows, as will be shown more fully hereafter, that the general
government or its functionaries enter Massachusetts or New York solely
by her permission; that they command or control living souls or things
in her territory solely for her, and by virture of her authority; and
that "the united states" (not the government, except as agent or
instrument of the united states) hold use and jurisdiction of sites for
forts, navy-yards, etc. from her, for the sole purpose of her and her
sisters' defence and safety, under her grant and subject to her
conditions.



The fact of state supremacy will be more plain, if we note and weigh the
only act which makes the federal constitution law in Massachusetts.
These are the ordaining words: "The convention, in behalf of the
people of the commonwealth  of Massachusetts, do assent to, and ratify
the constitution." New York, and all the other original states,
ordained the supreme law in the same way.



The truth is, the states are sovereign, and all the institutions and
rulers of the union are subordinate. The states are, as Hamilton said,
the "essential component parts of the union" of states, or
"the united states;" and the federal government is merely the
creation, the instrument, and the subject of the states,--declaration of
the Philadelphia Convention of 1866, that "the Government" has
"absolute supremacy," and that both people and states alike
allegiant to it, being hardly entitled to respect or refutation. Still
less worthy of notice—though of far higher origin—is that queer
figmnet or fanciful notion of Webster, Story, Curtis and Lincoln, as to
the social compact united states into a state. forming the people of the



                               Exposure of the Fallacy of New Social
Compact



Nay, more, this theory is so egregious a mistake, that ridicule is only
disarmed by pity, while argument turns away with scorn. The very object
of forming men into society, and giving them a collective capacity to
act, is government. Hence, in sending in deputies to devise, in holding
conventions to consider and ratify, and in electing agents and
functionaries to administer, the general constitution, the states were
exercising the God-given right of self-government, and doin only natural
and funcitonal actsl; and were not dissolving themselves or yielding
their sovereignty.



Accordingly, we find no hint in ALL of American history, tending to show
that the people, or the states, were in 1787 and 1788, forming society;
while ALL history, and ALL the records of the country show that the were
establishing government for pre-formed and pre-existent societies.



So much for the Curtis, Webster, Story and Lincoln social compact, and
involuntary union!



Again, these pre-existent societies had, by successful revolt changed
themselves from provinces to "free, SOVEREIGN, and independent
states;" that is to say, they had gained the God-given right of
self-government, that peculiar thing that alone distinguishes a state
from a province and county. These states had this right in 1787, and
then voluntarily acted with and according to it, each with her own
separate will, in her own separate time, and through her own separate
convention, ratifying, and as to herself, ordaining the constitution.



TO BE CONTINUED……………….



The legitimate conclusion, is obvious then, that the highest of all
political obligations in a REPUBLIC,  true to the social compact,
allegiance, patriotism as well as the instinct of self-preservation,
that if in our current climate of coercion against the states, any
traitors appear, they must be those who, being citizens and subjects of
states, using and implementing federal force and coercion in
"levying war against THEM," or adhered to THEIR enemies,
"giving them aid and comfort." Then those waging this war
against the states must be "their enemies," and the citizens of
states, who ASSIST such enemies, then must be Traitors???


[1]
<../../../../citizensoftheUSofA/messages%3fo%3d1%26yguid%3d208120019&use\
_rte=1#_ftnref1>   As  "the constitution of the united states"
contains the phrases, "united states," "union of
states," and "citizens of states," or their equivalents, I
will hereafter, for convenience, quote them thus—the following
actual phrases being my justification for the last two of
them:--"The several states…within this union." [Art. I. §
2.] "New states may be admitted…into this union." [Art. IV.
§ 2.] "Citizens of another state." [Art. III. § 2.]
"Citizens of different states." [Ibid.] "Citizens of the
same state." [Ibid.] "A state or the citizens thereof."
[Ibid.] "Citizens of another state." [Amend. XI.]

[2]
<../../../../citizensoftheUSofA/messages%3fo%3d1%26yguid%3d208120019&use\
_rte=1#_ftnref2>  On this subject, Massachusetts declares the following:
"The sovereignty and jurisdiction of the commonwealth, extend to all
places within the boundaries thereof; subject only to such rights of
concurrent jurisdiction, as have been, or may be granted over any places
ceded by the commonwealth to the united states." [See. Rev. Stat. of
Mass., ed. 1836, p.56.]

In Service,
Gabriel Paul

http://www.dayspringgatheringscircle.org
<http://www.dayspringgatheringscircle.org/dayspring_library.html>

Fear knocked at the door.....Faith Answered........There was no one
there.

Truth cannot be bought and sold, only temporarily obfuscated by
falsehood.Yet all falsehood and illusion will themselves ultimately be
crucified upon the cross of the omnipotent Sword of Truth when it
pierces the heart in purification.

There is something within me that might be illusion as it is often case
with young delighted people, but if I would be fortunate to achieve some
of my ideals, it would be on the behalf of the whole of humanity. Nikola
Tesla
I don't know what your destiny will be, but one thing I do know; the
only ones among you who will be really happy are those who have sought
and found how to serve.

"History is nothing but a procession of false absolutes, a series of
temples raised to pretexts, a degradation of the mind before the
improbable."

"War is the best way to remold society. War! Shatter society to bits.
Break it apart. Then we can remold it nearer to the heart's desire.
And what is our heart's desire? Collectivism."

Men with great knowledge are easily enslaved if they do nothing to
defend their freedom. Knowledge by itself is not power, but it holds the
potential for power if we have the courage to use it as such, and
therein lies our hope for the future. If we act upon this knowledge, it
is an opportunity, not just to know about history, but actually to
change its course.

"Remember when it was give me freedom or give me death? Now it is
save me from death and take my freedom, please."

NOTICE : This non commercial no tender for access or use private
research resource contains unpublished protected work product. THIS
PRIVATE NON COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATION IS EXPRESSLY NOT INTENDED FOR USE
BY ANYONE IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO DIAGNOSE, TREAT OR CURE ANY DISEASE OR
ILLNESS. We make all such non commercial speech and electronic
communication within this resource available in our private efforts to
promote well being, good, peace and harmony for all that includes but is
not limited to spiritual principals, human liberties, learning,
religious, economic, scientific and social ideas. The information
throughout each page of this resource hereto is provided at no cost and
should only be used by anyone willfully intending to read this material
at their own risk and strict sole enjoyment and benefit for
informational and historical research purposes only (expressly not for
commercial or re-sale use, in whole or in part, whatsoever) that will
request the information and all content herein is expressly not intended
nor offered nor presented nor published as commercial speech or legal,
tax or medical advice, in whole or in a part whatsoever as we are not
licensed attorney(s) in at law nor accountant(s) nor doctor(s) nor be
construed as legal, medical or tax speech, advice or services, in whole
or in part, whatsoever. You are hereby advised that you should seek your
own appropriate independent advice relating to all your private matters
by advisors of your choice, please get a second opinion, third opinion.
This is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any public or
private security, book, manual, workshop, recording, legal, tax,
accounting or medical advice, products or services in whole or in part
whatsoever. If you wish to use any unpublished work product and
materials for purposes of your own that go beyond your personal
enjoyment and benefit ( Limited Use Disclaimer-the downloaded and
private personal research/historical use by anyone constitutes agreement
that all books downloaded via DaySpring Library will not be RESOLD in
whole or in part, whatsoever by anyone), you must first obtain prior
written permission from gabriel @ dayspringgatheringscircle.org
Unpublished protected work product, In the year of our Lord, Two
Thousand and Eight, Anno Domini



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to