Isn't this theory,"Fight them over there so we don't have fight them 
over here.." just a bit worn out?

How long will people continue to believe canards like this latest 
promulgated bogeymen (wait it's the Germans, no the Japs, no wait its 
the Germans again, correction its those damn commies! Or is the 
illegal immigrants?)which is always shifting and changing appearances 
to suit the needs of those in power?

Butler Shaffer was right:

"The so-called "war on terror" is just another of the many state-run 
rackets designed to benefit governmental, media, and various business 
interests, all of whom profit from state-induced fears of others. 
Greater power and more tax dollars flow to political systems; the 
media enjoys an increase in viewers and readers; while untold numbers 
of government contractors, along with suppliers of goods and services 
for a market of frightened people, profit from this protection 
racket. In threatening to expand the war to other countries, the 
state increases hostilities from its targeted enemies, thus 
engendering more fears from Americans who demand "protection."

If physicians could figure out ways to inject people with deadly 
viruses that they could then treat with expensive tests, drugs, and 
medical advice, their profession would precisely correlate with the 
methods of the state!"--The Bogeyman Industry by Butler Shaffer 

http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer143.html



--- In [email protected], "Bob Giramma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Deterrence was a Cold War policy.  It led to the deaths of 50 - 100 
million people worldwide during those years, as well as two 
generations of people living under totalitarian regimes.  It cost the 
US $10 - 15 trillion to maintain its deterrent military force.  
> 
> It would have been better to take care of the Soviets in 1946, 
BEFORE they had nuclear weapons.  If that were done, the world today 
would be richer, safer, and FREER.
> 
> Stop the anti-libertarian political Islamist movement now, before 
we get another deadly cold war.
> 
> 
> From: Emil R.Wolanski 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:37 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> Subject: [Libertarian] Stop the War FOR Terror
> 
> 
> Stop the War FOR Terror
> 
> The Bush Administration is threatening war to stop Iran from 
developing nuclear weapons. Such a war would drive more Muslims 
toward terrorism. It would be a war for terrorism instead of a war 
against terrorism. We should do in Iran what we should have done in 
Iraq. We should return to our traditional policy of deterrence. 
Please join me in asking Congress to pass a resolution opposing a 
Presidential attack on Iran, and asking them to restore the 
traditional policy of deterrence. You can do so by clicking here: 
http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=54.
> 
> Thought I'd forward this on.
> 
> Come to DownsizeDC.org to learn more:
> http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=54
> 
> 
>  
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to