Here's one of your Islamic boogey men doing you: "I don't see how preemption against well-established anti-Muslims is inherently non-Islamic. The more anti-Muslims I neuter, the better for the Islamic cause.
As you can hopefully see, your inconsistent libertarianism is no better than criminal; and would justify any kind of crime, as long as it eventually benefited someone claiming to be a libertarian. It's similar to the "end justifies the means" value in a messiah complex: "I am good, so ANYTHING I do to benefit myself is good. It's becoming difficult to explain each and every one of your MANY instances of skewed libertarian logic, but the underlying cause would seem to be predicated on your rejection of the "consistent" part. ----------------------------------- I don't see how preemption against well-established anti-libertarians is inherently non-libertarian. The more anti-libertarians I neuter, the better for the libertarian cause.
