Sure you didn't. It just comes off that way,right? Why don't we focus on the problems with our country rather then trying to fix others.Thats what I don't get. Yes extremist are bad no matter what religion or race.But that doesn't mean its our job to "fix" it or them.Again not all people that are of Middle eastern decent are bad or "evil".Everyone has a mind of there own and is an individual.
Wendie _____________________________________________________________ --- In [email protected], "Bob Giramma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't propose to go around the world and fix every dysfunction country -- Muslim or otherwise. I don't care what ideology people follow, as long as they don't harm me or my property. The problem is the correlation between ideological obsession and aggression against others. If ideology leads someone to attack me, then it's worth noting what that ideology represents. > > I want the US government to focus on neutering those individuals, groups, and nations that present a credible threat to Americans. Throughout my teens and adult life, there have been numerous attacks by Middle East terrorists on Americans, with 9/11 being the mother of all terrorist attacks. These are real threats and must be dealt with. > > > From: ma ni > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 2:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Stop the War FOR Terror > > > Bob, > > Libertarians are only "good" if they follow consistent > libertarianism. Your brand of libertarianism is just as bad as > your "Islamism". It doesn't matter how anti-libertarian any > ideology is, you can't justifiably annihilate it unless it > presents a credible threat to you. Simply being a theocratic and > authoritarian system of government is not sufficient grounds. > Neither is "spreading their ways in numerous countries". Neither > is unproven rumors that they "harbor those responsible for > murdering thousands of Americans". Neither is "using the Koran as > the basis". > > Surely your second paragraph is a joke. > > ------------------------- > > You say "Muslims" and "Islamic," but note that my opposition is > towards Islamism -- using the Koran as the basis for a theocratic > and authoritarian system of government. I'm confident there are > liberty-loving Muslims out there somewhere, but not among the > Islamists. > > You are using moral relativism, equating Islamism with > libertarianism. That is fundamentally flawed logic. > Libertarians are good; Islamists are bad. Got it? Your mother > was supposed to teach you this stuff. > > There are some ideologies that are seriously flawed and > dangerous. Among those are communism, socialism, fascism, > feudalism, and Islamism. Would I be falling for the boogeyman > stories if communism or fascism were growing worldwide, and I > worried about it? Would a growing Christian theocracy concern > you? > > As a libertarian, I DO believe my libertarian values are good, > and I DO believe that anything that benefits liberty is good. I > can distinguish good ideologies from bad. If Islamists kept to > their own little authoritarian outpost in Waziristan, I would > have no concern. But when those same Islamists spread their ways > in numerous countries, and harbor those responsible for murdering > thousands of Americans, then I can no longer ignore them. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
