--- In [email protected], "diablogonzales" <spammastergr...@...>
wrote:
>No one wants to return to a barbaric culture of half apes. Laws
>protect us, our families and children.
Actually, they ENSLAVE you, your family, and your children. Laws are nothing
more than written threats backed by police violence.
>There would be no private property because the world would be on fire
>with murder and theft.
The world IS on fire with murder and theft. It's called war and taxes.
>Like post apocalyptic movies. If you had a house, armed people would
>try to take it constantly.
You mean like the armed police that would take my house if I stopped paying my
protection money on time? So much for private property.
>[Corporations] have the responsibility not to harm people, like any
>person. The managers making decisions have the personal responbility
>not to lie cheat, harm the population or they should go to prison.
>They want the same rights as an individulal, perverting the 14th
>amendment, they should have the same responsibility.
I agree. Unfortunately, corporate law is designed to shield these managers from
personal responsibility.
> Then they are in the wrong country. In fact wrong era. They already
> tried that in Germany.
Tried what in Germany?
>You have a mideastern sounding name, how do you feel about people not
>hiring Arabs and Indians? Or paying you less. You are in favor of the
>practice?
Of course not, but government intervention solves nothing. In fact, it would
only fan the flames of racial hatred by allowing bigots to claim that they are
the victims.
> You can't let profit and supply and demand dictate laws regulations
> and governance.
I don't want laws or governance at all, so why would you suggest that I want
profit and supply to dictate them?
> "If they kidnap children, and sell them as sex slaves, they will get bad
> publicity."
>
> "People will eventually find out their products are poison, and stop
using them."
>
Actually, people that engage in these practices can expect more than just bad
publicity; they can expect violent retaliation.
>We live in a civilized society by which we expect people to live by
>the golden rule, and create laws to hold people to them. To punish
>theft, rape and murder.
Rather than just punish those crimes, I'd rather prevent them from happening in
the first place by allowing individuals to arm themselves.
> You don't wait till people are cheated, you prevent it from
> happening by making it illegal.
This sort of consumer "protection" law only serve to create a false sense of
security among the population which makes them easy targets for fraud.
>Every society has laws, every government some regulations. And for
>good reason. No modern society could exist without them. I could rape
>any woman, steal any car, murder any homeowner without them.
You could commit those crimes right now, but you run the risk of being caught
and punished. In a free society (well-armed) you can commit those crimes as
well but also run the risk of being killed by your victim in the process.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what a law is, what it's
capable of achieving, and what it's unintended consequences are. Laws cannot
protect you from crime, but they are very good at facilitating crime.
---Sasan
