If this guy was innocent, wasn't it up to him to prove that to the satisfaction of the Libertarian's who validate candidacy? Sure he is innocent until proven guilty, but when you want to run for public office, you have a little more responsibility to look "pure as Nero's wife" to your backers. I'm shocked that he was allowed to serve at all. He makes Libertarians look bad. We are all Libertarians, but not all Catholics. It is not our duty to educate the public on the rights of pedophiles. We run for office on Constitutioal principles. If I am missing something here, I am sure several of you will point it out to me...Tnx "Just Say NO!!!" Nancy Reagan--DEMOCRACY: 2 Wolves (Dms & Reps) and a Lamb (American Public) Voting on Lunch......REPUBLIC: Protecting Individual Rights!!! "Americans can rebuild America." --Jane Stilwell Libertarian RON PAUL for Pres...!!! ________________________________ From: Bruce Cohen <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 10:42:40 PM Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Headline: The Sex Scandal that SHOCKED the Libertarian Party
Yeah he's guilty. He was a Scoutmaster of some sort and well, the court file pretty much says it all. Anyone want a copy? It's public record and has traveled all over California. He was charge with six counts and ended up plea bargaining to three, serving time in prison. Very very guilty. Isn't what he did initiation of force against those innocent little Boy Scouts? --- On Thu, 4/8/10, James C <jcpatr...@hotmail. com> wrote: From: James C <jcpatr...@hotmail. com> Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Headline: The Sex Scandal that SHOCKED the Libertarian Party To: libertarian@ yahoogroups. com Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 3:40 PM Is this guy guilty? I have seen states convict people as sex offenders on just accusations. Maybe he became an activist because he got screwed by the court system. I have seen enough libertarians become activists because they got screwed in some form or another by the system. James To: cal-l...@yahoogroup s.com CC: libertariancandidat e...@yahoogroups. com; sdlibc...@listserv. sdlp.org From: brucedcohen2002@ yahoo.com Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:38:04 -0700 Subject: [Libertarian] Headline: The Sex Scandal that SHOCKED the Libertarian Party Link to Inland Empire Weekly http://www.ieweekly.com/cms/index/?menu=Home Link to Article: http://www.ieweekly.com/cms/story/detail/votes_on_a_scandal/3148/ Votes on a Scandal A decades-old sex crime comes back with a vengeance—and shakes up the Libertarian Party By: Alex Distefano It’s no secret that in the current political climate, more Americans are experiencing a sense of frustration and even distrust towards both Democrats and Republicans. Within this two-party dichotomy, many voters are opening their minds, ears and even pocketbooks to support an alternative third party. This is where the Libertarian Party comes into the picture. In California, many Libertarians have been elected to local and state offices. According to stats from the 2008 early voter registration totals, 384,722 California voters—or 28 percent of the total registered as Libertarians—voted in the last election. Since the party’s inception in 1971, the Libertarian movement has seen a slow but steady increase in support, with a platform focused on individual freedoms and smaller government. What it probably didn’t need was a scandal to wreak havoc with the party. But that’s exactly what it got. See the rest of the article at: http://www.ieweekly.com/cms/story/detail/votes_on_a_scandal/3148/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. http://www.windowsl ive.com/campaign /thenewbusy? tile=multiaccoun t&ocid=PID28326: :T:WLMTAGL: ON:WL:en- US:WM_HMP: 042010_4 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------ --------- --------- ------ ForumWebSiteAt http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Libertaria n Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
