On 02.11.2006 [11:52:41 +1100], David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:26:12AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 31.10.2006 [13:18:18 +1100], David Gibson wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:01:54PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > On 31.10.2006 [10:26:47 +1100], David Gibson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:26:56AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > > > On 30.10.2006 [15:56:43 +1100], David Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > Latest daemon removal path. Updated to apply clean on top of the > > > > > > > latest changes in the git tree, otherwise nothing new. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that 1.0.1 is out, are we ready to merge this? Remember that > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > can make a git branch to hold strictly-maintenance revisions of > > > > > > > 1.0/1.0.1 for Red Hat, if necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > FWIW, no S-o-b line was included. We're also trying to follow kernel > > > > > > patch-style, so a description (probably more complete than what the > > > > > > above, even though I have enough context to know what you mean) is > > > > > > necessary, too. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I know. The omissions is deliberate, because that patch was for > > > > > discussion rather than immediate acceptance. > > > > > > > > Ok, I thought so too, but then you requested it be merged. Was just > > > > trying to figure out where we stood. > > > > > > Sorry, I was not very clear. I was meaning are we in principle ready > > > to merge, once I do a final cleaned up release, not please merge this > > > now. > > > > Fair enough :) > > > > I'd say, yes, if we can get some more in-depth testing (am working on > > this now). > > Ok. I tend to think it will get its testing fastest if we merge into > the git tree now. Again, we can branch from 1.0.1 if we need to make > more maintenance releases for Red Hat which shouldn't include the new > code.
Further functional tested has been completed. I don't have performance numbers yet, but hopefully will have them soon. So I am ok with checking this in. > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Just to be clear, David's patch was built on top of mine, so the Signed-off-by makes sense, in case anyone asks. And for completeness' sake, I'll give it again: Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
