On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 13:07 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 15.11.2006 [12:41:44 +1100], David Gibson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:49:48PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 14.11.2006 [15:28:37 -0600], Adam Litke wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:55 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > > On 14.11.2006 [12:29:01 +1100], David Gibson wrote: > > <snip> > > > Good as far as it goes. However, we should probably *also* do some > > tests where we don't clear the cache between runs. After all the > > elflink code is supposed to work if the cache already exists, too. > > Try #3, incorporating both your and Adam's comments: > > After the daemon removal, there was a change in the side-effects of > running `make check` relative to the linkshare testcases, as hugepages > would be left consumed on the system, that were not before the test ran. > `rm -rf` the files we create (we assume the testsuite is the only > hugepage consumer on the system in general, when run), to free them back > up after running. Run the elfshare test twice now, once with this > cleaning up of hugepages and once without. > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com) IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel