On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 13:07 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 15.11.2006 [12:41:44 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:49:48PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 14.11.2006 [15:28:37 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:55 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > > On 14.11.2006 [12:29:01 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > Good as far as it goes.  However, we should probably *also* do some
> > tests where we don't clear the cache between runs.  After all the
> > elflink code is supposed to work if the cache already exists, too.
> 
> Try #3, incorporating both your and Adam's comments:
> 
> After the daemon removal, there was a change in the side-effects of
> running `make check` relative to the linkshare testcases, as hugepages
> would be left consumed on the system, that were not before the test ran.
> `rm -rf` the files we create (we assume the testsuite is the only
> hugepage consumer on the system in general, when run), to free them back
> up after running. Run the elfshare test twice now, once with this
> cleaning up of hugepages and once without.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel

Reply via email to