On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 15:36 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Between this and the following patch, which is preferred?
Not a strong preference either way, but v1 looks a little cleaner. You
did miss one little thing though for which the below fixes (plus removes
an unneeded label). I'm running this through speccpu2000 now to check
for regressions.
elflink: fix new seginfo field name. remove old label.
Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- libhugetlbfs-dev-20070129/elflink.c 2007-02-05 13:03:12.000000000 -0600
+++ libhugetlbfs-drftest/elflink.c 2007-02-05 12:54:31.000000000 -0600
@@ -568,9 +568,8 @@
bail:
DEBUG("Unable to perform minimal copy\n");
bail2:
- seg->extra_start = start_orig;
+ seg->extra_vaddr = start_orig;
seg->extrasz = end_orig - start_orig;
-bail3:
return;
}
--
Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
