On 05.02.2007 [13:07:11 -0600], Steve Fox wrote: > On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 15:36 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > Between this and the following patch, which is preferred? > > Not a strong preference either way, but v1 looks a little cleaner. You > did miss one little thing though for which the below fixes (plus > removes an unneeded label). I'm running this through speccpu2000 now > to check for regressions.
Cool, thanks -- I think I caught the compile-time issues after I posted or something. Will make sure my patches are uptodate before requesting inclusion post 1.1. Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
