On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 15:11 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Adam, how about this as an implementation of the version checks you
> suggested.

This seems totally reasonable and definitely a bit simpler than I
imagined... Probably due to using the HUGETLB_VERSION env variable
instead of some library API call. 

> Now that we have tools (such as hugectl) which interact directly with the
> library it is good to know the versions of both in the debugging output
> and good to check that the versions match.  Where they do not report that
> as a WARNING.

> -apw
> 
> Andy Whitcroft (4):
>   hugectl: report the version as part of the usage output
>   library: report the library version
>   hugectl: pass the tool version to the library for checking
>   library: check associated tools version where offered
> 
>  elflink.c |    5 +++++
>  hugectl.c |    7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
-- 
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel

Reply via email to