> Also, I'm talking about a _complete_ redo of the directories... not  
> just move stuff around.  I'd like to powow for a bit and come up with  
> all new names and structure... for instance "numerics" can mean a LOT  
> of different things (hence why a bunch of junk ends up in there)....  
> which could be split into say: solver_interfaces, functions,  
> error_estimators.  This isn't a real suggestion... but just to give  
> you a flavor.

when I was a kid we used slide rules and there were two subdirectories: src and 
include.  So be happy for what you've got!

but seriously, I'm all for a cleanup.  A major cleanup.  We've never supported 
a "make install", which is obviously pretty lame and a good place to start.  We 
should think about what that might need to do and work backwards from there.  
At the end of the day there will probably only be a few headers that users need 
that are in the "global namespace", with the others relegated to (meaningnful) 
subdirectories...

In the meantime, we can easily add "error_estimation" and it will affect no 
user code so long as we add it to the -I path...

-Ben


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to