> Did you see where w_0 is given for this degree 5 tet rule? I suppose > I can figure it out by summing the other 14 and subtracting from the > volume... >
Good question, I'm not sure. Is it intended to imply that w_0 is the same in for both rows of Table 2.1? If so, it's not very clearly written... > Anyway, I agree with you: this does appear to be different from the > 15-point rule in the library. If you haven't already, I think I will > take a closer look at this one's accuracy claims. > I haven't tested out the 15-point rule in Walkington's paper. Are you going to compare it to the 5th order rule that is already in libMesh (hopefully they both integrate degree 5 polynomials exactly!) - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
