Just a random thought: would it be better to give these functions human-readable names (receive, nonblocking_receive) instead of MPI-derived names? People familiar with MPI still have to look at our headers to determine that they want Parallel::irecv rather than Parallel::Irecv (as well as to see the function arguments), so I don't know if using the same name truncations buys us anything. --- Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
