On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a random thought: would it be better to give these functions > human-readable names (receive, nonblocking_receive) instead of > MPI-derived names? People familiar with MPI still have to look at our > headers to determine that they want Parallel::irecv rather than > Parallel::Irecv (as well as to see the function arguments), so I don't > know if using the same name truncations buys us anything.
No opinion really, as long as the comments say which MPI function it's equivalent to/going to call. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
