That would be preferable to me. Derek
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > Just a random thought: would it be better to give these functions > human-readable names (receive, nonblocking_receive) instead of > MPI-derived names? People familiar with MPI still have to look at our > headers to determine that they want Parallel::irecv rather than > Parallel::Irecv (as well as to see the function arguments), so I don't > know if using the same name truncations buys us anything. > --- > Roy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
