On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Benjamin Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Right now we can get a bounding box for two processors easily
> >>> enough, and (I am sure you are gonna love this...) overload '&&' to
> >>> return true if they intersect.
> >>
> >> If you must use operator overloading, at least use '&' instead?
> >> Bitwise AND resembles an intersection operation more than logical AND
> >> does.
>
> Nah,
>
> bool intersect(const BoundaryDescription &other) const {}
>
> will work just fine for me... I kinda just wanted to stir things up (quiet
> day in the office),
>
[snipped fascist coding guidelines commentary]
> And apparently succeeded. ;-)
Gah, you've found my weakness. I can't say no to a lively C++
language discussion. I read comp.lang.c++.moderated in my spare
time...
--
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
