On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Derek Gaston wrote: > >> Objections? > > Yes - doing so with the existing functions would break backwards > compatibility for other NonlinearSystem users; doing so by adding new > functions would make the API redundant and confusing, especially if we > had to do so again later for whatever grander idea we settle on.
Any way to make the extra argument be a default NULL pointer or is this something that can't really be overloaded in that way? -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
