I thought about this... but I don't think there is a way. I believe the signatures have to match exactly or the function pointer won't be accepted.
Could be wrong though... Derek On Apr 30, 2010, at 1:36 PM, John Peterson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Derek Gaston wrote: >> >>> Objections? >> >> Yes - doing so with the existing functions would break backwards >> compatibility for other NonlinearSystem users; doing so by adding new >> functions would make the API redundant and confusing, especially if we >> had to do so again later for whatever grander idea we settle on. > > Any way to make the extra argument be a default NULL pointer or is > this something that can't really be overloaded in that way? > > -- > John > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
