On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But seriously: it would be quite reasonable to add a Parameters object
> to each System as well, if you want. What I'd really like is a simple
> API for querying parameters that would check the System first, then
> check the EquationSystems second... maybe give a Parameters object an
> optional Parameters* parent?
Only thing I'd worry about is users wanting to redefine the 'built-in'
parameters libmesh uses ("linear solver tolerance", "nonlinear solver
tolerance", "linear solver maximum iterations", etc) on a per-System
basis while the internals of libmesh keep using the parent ES value
for those parameters. Might lead to confusion/misunderstanding but
not bugs per se.
--
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
