On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Cody Permann wrote:
> This update looks good from my perspective, however maybe we need to > update netCDF too? Opinions? My vote would be to update netCDF as long as we're at it, but if you've got things working without such an update there's no reason to bundle everything into a single commit; start with exodus-alone. > I'm happy to commit my changes but I'd like to hear back from the > developers before doing so. I'd say go ahead and commit so everyone else can start testing too. Besides, the svn head is already in a state of shame at the moment. My new NodeConstraints feature goes into an infinite loop with ParallelMesh, so there's four "--enable-everything --enable-parmesh" regression test failures that I'm still trying to correct. Even after that, we aren't planning a new official release soon. That nasty PetscVector::localize() issue ought to get a real fix instead of just a workaround first. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
