On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
On Friday, January 27, 2012, David Knezevic <dkneze...@seas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm
> all for it too!
Have you ever tried
http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us.
Any support there for vector-valued functions? It looks like it fixes
one gaping flaw in mu: support for types other than double. But I
really wouldn't want to give up that comma separated vector-valued
function syntax in mu without some equivalent.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
