On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
On Friday, January 27, 2012, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
>>
>> ? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us.
>
> What are your experiences with the optimizer code? Worth the extra
> code, hassle of testing for bison, etc?
I don't think its ever shown up in any profiling we've ever done, if that's
what you're asking....
Mostly I'm asking whether it would be an acceptable cop-out if I
included the fparser4.4.3 code in contrib rather than the full
more-complex-to-build fparser4.4.3_devel suite.
Oh, which brings up an issue for everyone else: fparser doesn't have a
nice autoconf build system like muParser does; presuming we pick
fparser then I'd be putting it in contrib right off just to save
myself the hassle of building and installing it everywhere.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
