On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, John Peterson wrote: > >> On Friday, January 27, 2012, David Knezevic <dkneze...@seas.harvard.edu> >> wrote: >> > This could be very beneficial for the reduced basis code as well, so I'm >> > all for it too! >> >> Have you ever tried >> >> http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/ >> >> ? I haven't tried mu, but the above works pretty well for us. > > > Any support there for vector-valued functions? It looks like it fixes
f: R^N -> R^N? I don't think I've used it that way, but maybe you could wrap your own class around several scalar fparser objects... > one gaping flaw in mu: support for types other than double. But I Well, that may not be an issue any longer? Rev 2.1.0: 19.11.2011 Bugfixes MUP_BASETYPE can now be any of: float, double, long double, short, unsigned short, unsigned int, long, unsigned long. Previousely only floating point types were allowed. Using "int" is still not allowed! -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
