On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Derek Gaston wrote: > it heavily relies on the Makefiles libMesh generates.
Makefiles, plural? I expect there's quite a few people (myself included) who have application code which relies on our Make.common. But getting automake to export a backwards compatible (or even a practically identical) Make.common wouldn't be too hard. In this case I'd still love to see us move to automake. But are you also relying on our Makefile.const, or much worse: our Makefile? That would be much more precarious; automake throws a ton of crap into its generated Makefiles and there'd be no telling what might conflict with an external system. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
