On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:01 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your second patch isn't really a great fix, since technically things
> should be initialized in the constructor in the order they are
> declared in the class,
You're right, of course.
> but, thinking about it for a moment, this
> constructor is just oddly-written in general: there's not really any
> need to call all these vector default constructors explicitly.
> Probably just really old code I'm guessing...should be fine to just
> delete all of those guys.
>
I'm OK either way - I can reorder the declarations in the class or I can
remove the explicit constructor calls, whichever you folks prefer (I'm
leaning towards removing them).
>
> Anyway, all our tests seem to pass here.
Awesome, thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
