On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
benjamin.kir...@nasa.gov> wrote:

> On 9/13/12 11:19 AM, "John Peterson" <peter...@cfdlab.ae.utexas.edu>
> wrote:
>
> >> #include "libmesh/base/dof_map.h"
> >
> > Better because more unique?  Feels a little "boost"y to me, but I
> > guess I could get used to it.
>
> better because I still want sudirectories to organize the header files.
>
> #include "libmesh/dof_map.h"
>
> would be fine but would require we create a libmesh directory inside each
> of
> our current subdirectories, and it is the only thing in there.  So we'd
> have
>
> include/base/*    -> include/base/libmesh/*
> include/enums/* -> include/enums/libmesh/*
> ...
>

You shouldn't need to do this in the source. We could retain the current
directory infrastructure in the source and use the build system to install
everything in $LIBMESH_INSTALL/include/libmesh/

I like this because you can still have uniqueness wrt to libmesh headers
but without creating a large directory hierarchy. Of course, this is
predicated that one will be buidling apps against the install and not the
source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to