On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
> I'll take that as another vote for "don't remove the existing option
> until the new option has been available for a couple releases".
Actually - it's fine with me if you want to change it immediately. I hate
not renumbering by passing True ;-)
> The reason for the double negative is to emphasize that renumbering is
> the default, but that's a weak reason. Unless someone else disagrees
> I'll change it to "allow_renumbering" or some such shortly.
>
Yeah - I'm with you... but man I've messed this up a few times over the
years!
Derek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
