On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
I think the issue is that it sets it back to the old value of
skip_renumber at the end of prepare_for_use(). This is only an
issue in parallel... where I believe the renumbering can actually
happen and multiple spots.
Any idea where? I can only find renumber_nodes_and_elements() calls
in MeshBase::prepare_for_use() and
UnstructuredMesh::all_{first,second}_order() - I assume the latter
aren't the problem?
So basically, even though we're passing "true" to skip
renumbering... that's only being used during prepare_for_use() and
then forgotten after that point... which wasn't what the old
behavior did.
Didn't it? The old behavior was that there was no member variable,
and the input bool went out of scope at the end of prepare_for_use(),
so any setting passed in must have been forgotten afterwards.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
