On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > I applied this on libmesh.automake, which imposes strict namespacing, and I > had to add > > 'using namepace libMesh;' > > inside your anonymous namespace in parallel_implementation.h so that > Parallel:: was found properly.
Bah - I forgot to test with namespace separation enabled. Thanks for catching that! > Then testing with FIN-S showed no issues! Thanks, to both you and Paul! Unless I hear screams from elsewhere I'll commit this afternoon. Any preferences or suggestions on the naming issue? I really don't want to replace (much less deprecate) the old Parallel::sum(x) type calls until we've got something nicer looking than Parallel::Communicator_World.sum(x) to replace them. CommWorld.sum(x)? Comm_World.sum(x)? Comm.sum(x)? MPIWorld.sum(x)? --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
