I agree with Roy. Derek
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > >> Sounds good to me. I would say if it's not checked-in by Tuesday >> night, go ahead. But if you want to push 0.8.0 before then, I see no >> compelling reason for this to hold it up since it would be a new >> feature (IMHO), but I defer to you. > > Not just a new feature, but a new feature which would affect > significant core code paths. Not that I should be one to talk > (although I think I've unbroken my totally-safe-bugfix that recently > broke ParallelMesh regression tests), but I've already been telling > Vikram to hold off on adding a new feature that *wouldn't* affect any > existing methods. My vote would be to keep this out of trunk until > 0.8.0 is official (sometime early next week, unless anyone screams). > --- > Roy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
