On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Derek Gaston <fried...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Roy. > > Derek > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote: >> >>> Sounds good to me. I would say if it's not checked-in by Tuesday >>> night, go ahead. But if you want to push 0.8.0 before then, I see no >>> compelling reason for this to hold it up since it would be a new >>> feature (IMHO), but I defer to you. >> >> Not just a new feature, but a new feature which would affect >> significant core code paths. Not that I should be one to talk >> (although I think I've unbroken my totally-safe-bugfix that recently >> broke ParallelMesh regression tests), but I've already been telling >> Vikram to hold off on adding a new feature that *wouldn't* affect any >> existing methods. My vote would be to keep this out of trunk until >> 0.8.0 is official (sometime early next week, unless anyone screams). >> --- >> Roy That's fair. Consider 0.8.0-rc1 a feature freeze that will only accept bug fixes, and it will become 0.8.0 next week. After that there are a number of changes coming, but we can open a separate thread on that later. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
