On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > >> I'm all for (1). >> >> Note thought that MPI_Request_free does not cancel communication - >> MPI_Cancel does. MPI_Request_free says you have no need for this >> particular >> request - possibly because you will be able to infer when it has completed >> due to some knowledge of program structure. >> >> MPI_Cancel is definitely not used in our code and according to the docs >> 'can >> be an expensive operation that should be used only exceptionally.' >> >> So what about Request::free() and a clean destructor? > > Okay, I'm convinced. I guess the attached patch does everything we need, > doesn't it?
I think that should do it. You want to commit to trunk; I'll commit to (and grumblingly tarball up) 0.7.0.2? Thanks, --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
