On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Roy Stogner wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: >> >>> I'm all for (1). >>> >>> Note thought that MPI_Request_free does not cancel communication - >>> MPI_Cancel does. MPI_Request_free says you have no need for this >>> particular >>> request - possibly because you will be able to infer when it has completed >>> due to some knowledge of program structure. >>> >>> MPI_Cancel is definitely not used in our code and according to the docs >>> 'can >>> be an expensive operation that should be used only exceptionally.' >>> >>> So what about Request::free() and a clean destructor? >> >> Okay, I'm convinced. I guess the attached patch does everything we need, >> doesn't it? > > I think that should do it. You want to commit to trunk; I'll commit > to (and grumblingly tarball up) 0.7.0.2?
Okay, it's in now. Tim -- Dr. Tim Kroeger CeVis -- Center of Complex Systems and Visualization University of Bremen [email protected] Universitaetsallee 29 [email protected] D-28359 Bremen Phone +49-421-218-7710 Germany Fax +49-421-218-4236 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
